Tuesday, September 27, 2016

The SpaceX Plan to Colonize Mars


At this week's International Astronautical Congress, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk outlined a bold and well thought out approach for the colonization of Mars based on three key principles:

  1. Reusing all system components to minimize costs
  2. Fueling outbound transports in orbit to maximize payload capacity
  3. Enabling fuel production on Mars to eliminate the need to carry return fuel

Reusable booster rockets will carry interplanetary transport vehicles and fuel tankers into Earth orbit and return to land back at the launch site. These massive boosters, powered by 42 of SpaceX's new Raptor engines, have four times the payload capacity of the Saturn V moon rocket. Reusing these boosters not only cuts cost, but drastically reduces the time required to deliver additional payloads.

The transport vehicles will carry people and cargo back and forth between Earth and Mars, and the tankers will be used to fuel the transports in Earth orbit. This approach will allow the transports to be launched without fuel on board, maximizing the amount of people and supplies each ship can carry to Mars.



The transport ship and tanker will be based on the same fuselage design to keep costs to a minimum. Both of these ships can return to Earth using aerobraking and propulsive landing capability so they can be reused on subsequent missions, another key factor in managing costs. The transport ship will also be capable of landing on Mars and launching from there back to Earth. Since Mars' gravity is only 38% of Earth's, the transports will not require a booster rocket to return home.



In order to get back to Earth, fuel must be produced on Mars. To enable this, the Raptor engine runs on methane and oxygen, both of which can be produced on Mars using the carbon dioxide that makes up most of the atmosphere and the water ice that can be found on and under the ground. Power generated by solar panels or nuclear reactors can be used to melt the ice and split the hydrogen from the oxygen via electrolysis. Some of the oxygen can be used for rocket oxidizer, and the rest can be used for life support. The hydrogen can then be combined with the carbon dioxide in a reaction to create methane rocket fuel and water for life support.

Musk's plan is based on the (approximately) 2-year cycles of Earth-Mars orbital alignment when getting to Mars will only take 90 to 120 days. He envisions a fleet of transports that will gather in Earth orbit and all leave for Mars together at these times. This will allow large amounts or cargo and large numbers of colonists to arrive at once, increasing the odds of survival for the colonists since the loss of any one ship will have less overall impact on the mission.

All of this sounds amazing, yet what makes it plausible is that SpaceX is already a successful, fully-integrated space systems provider, and they have already developed many of the technologies required for this plan to succeed. However, there are still some major obstacles to clear:

  • SpaceX will need a lot of additional cash to complete this plan. Musk was clear that he will need funding help from both the private and public sector to get the system built.
  • The booster and transport/tanker vehicles are still being designed, and there are major technical challenges to be worked out along the way. For example, the design calls for composite fuel tanks to keep weight down, but it may be difficult to make this material work at this scale and with the temperatures and pressures required as Lockheed learned during their failed attempt to build the SSTO Venture Star space transport back in 2001.
  • How the colonists will be housed, fed, and protected from radiation on the long journey to Mars is still being worked out. Musk believes the radiation risk is small and can be mitigated by keeping the ship pointed away from the sun during the transit, using the engine, fuel tanks, water stores, and cargo to shield the passengers.
  • How the proper landing sites will be selected and prepared prior to the first colonists' arrival is still to be determined. Building enough habitat for hundreds or thousands of colonists is a large task, and making sure that fuel production and food production facilities are already in place is critical to success. If you land too far from the ice, or if one of the transports crashes on the fuel factory, the mission is doomed.
  • Exactly how the colony will be sustained in terms of food, water, air, and housing is still not clear. We'll need to figure out how to build and maintain airtight and radiation-proof structures using as much local material as possible. We'll also need to learn how to grow food on Mars.
  • Having a lot of people on Mars will require some form of local government. Just like on Earth, there will be disagreements, crimes, and other problems between people that will have to be dealt with. You will need police, courts, and jails.
  • Since there will be men and women, there will be babies. Education facilities will be required at some point.
  • What will be the basis of the colonists' economy? Will they be employees of SpaceX? Will they get (or even need) a salary? Will there be taxes? How will goods and services be equitably distributed?

Musk indicated a belief that building a self-sustaining colony on Mars would be a 40 to 100 year process, and he plans to start sending the first ships by 2018. These would initially be the smaller unmanned Dragon capsules, followed by the large colonial transports in 2023. Assuming he can get the funding, given the estimated costs and life expectancy of the various ships, he believes he can deliver people and cargo to Mars for less than $140,000 per ton. This is an amazing achievement when compared to the cost of current approaches for interplanetary travel.

Finally, we should consider the human element of this endeavor. Life on Mars will be difficult, the work will be hard, and the risk of death will be omnipresent. In many ways, the Martian colonists will be like those who left Europe for the New World in the 17th century. Many will die in shipwrecks, from work accidents, from illnesses, and other things that we don't often concern ourselves with in the developed world. On top of all that they will have to live in an enclosed habitat all the time; going outside will require a space suit. Given this, will people even want to go to Mars? If they go will they want to stay? What will be their motivation? Musk's goal of making humanity a multi-planet species is admirable, but previous colonization events have been driven by people's internal desires to find a better life for themselves and their family. Will Mars hold this kind of promise for enough people to create a viable community, or will it end up as just another lonely outpost for a few dedicated explorers and scientists? Only time will tell, and I look forward to seeing how this develops over the next few years.



Friday, September 9, 2016

Sour Apples: iPhone 7 Disappoints


The new iPhone 7 is a disappointment, not for what it is but for what it could have been.

Let me explain.

On Wednesday, Apple announced their new hardware, specifically updated watches and phones. There was a lot of anticipation in advance of the event, with intense speculation that Apple would remove the analog headphone jack from the phone.

The headphone jack is certainly gone from the iPhone 7. However, what's also missing is any real innovation. There are many small refinements including better cameras, improved CPU performance, improved wireless network performance, and improved battery life, but these are things most consumers take for granted in annual tech refresh cycles. Other changes like new case colors, stereo speakers, and the new home button design seem more focused on style than substance.

The headphone jack removal is very polarizing for Apple consumers, because it interferes with common usage patterns that have persisted for almost a decade. Many people listen and recharge at the same time, and now you'll need an extra dongle for that. Many people plug their phones into their cars and other audio gear using the headphone jack, and now you'll need an extra dongle for that, too. And did we mention that this dongle doesn't offer another Lightning port for charging? So if you don't have Bluetooth audio in your car, forget about playing your tunes and arriving with a fully-charged phone.

Why didn't Apple add wireless charging? This is a feature found on many high-end Android phones and the Apple Watch. It would have nullified the complaint that with the new iPhone people can't simultaneously charge their phone and listen to music or make phone calls. It would have eliminated the need for a 'charge and listen' dongle that people don't want to carry around with them since they already have to carry a charger and/or they have one on their desk or nightstand. The option to use Bluetooth headphones is there, but these also have limitations mostly in the form of battery life; I have been on many conference calls that exceed the 4-hour capability of Apple's new AirPods, so would I have to buy two sets of them just in case they conked out mid-call?

Why didn't Apple introduce an OLED screen? This offers better contrast and lower power consumption than LCD, and has also been a feature on higher-end Android competitors for years. Because it doesn't required a backlight panel, it would have let the iPhone get even thinner or the extra space could have been used to increase battery capacity.

Finally, why didn't Apple ditch the Lightning jack altogether and introduce WiGig capability? This super fast 60GHz radio would have let the iPhone support HD and UHD video to desktop monitors and big screen TVs. It would have also allowed the device be totally sealed against dirt and water with no external connectors. More than that, it would have allowed the iPhone to become a single device that could use multiple screens and peripherals to serve as a phone, tablet, desktop, and entertainment device. Imagine pairing your iPhone with a wireless game controller and big screen TV to play video games in high-definition, or pairing it a desktop monitor, keyboard, and trackpad to use office applications and browse the web.

These are the kinds of changes Apple's customers are looking for, but at this point we can only hope for next year. Unfortunately for Apple, the Android platform is more competitive than ever. The recently released and highly-polished Nougat OS and new high-end devices from Samsung and other manufacturers are appealing even to Apple die hards. It seems like Apple's visionary image is tarnishing, and they are transforming into just another mega company trying to protect margins on existing products instead of taking bold risks on new capabilities that drive the industry forward.

p.s.: I didn't even mention that there was not a single announcement related to their personal computer business, even though the Mac lineup has not seen a major change in several years. I'm writing this on a three-year-old Macbook Air, and Apple doesn't have a single product that is compelling me to upgrade. I'll probably write about this in a future article.